A good deed, a grammar lesson and more
That’s what we do
Several months ago, I was walking out of a west-side grocery store when I noticed an elderly gentleman with a cane having a difficult time loading his groceries in his car. I went over and began to help him. He was grateful for the help. I noticed a blue sticker on his car from the Naval Joint Reserve Base along with one indicating he was a retired full colonel. When I finished helping him, he said, “Thank you very much.” I responded with a snappy salute and a, “No problem, colonel, my pleasure.”
His face lit up like a West Texas sunrise. I walked away thinking here is a man who has given his whole life in defense of our country. But out there, in that cold, rainy parking lot, it didn’t make any difference that he was a colonel and I was just a sergeant. It was one veteran helping another in need. That’s what we do.
— Bill Woodard, Fort Worth
Know thy grammar
Regarding letter writer Joe Nelson’s comment that “it’s ‘my family and I’ and not ‘me and my family’ ” — sometimes it’s “my family and me.” (See: “Grammar matters,” June 1) Had Jerry Jones said the new Cowboys stadium was a gift from Arlington taxpayers to my family and me, he would have been correct on two levels.
— Sharon Morrow, Arlington
Regarding the June letter from Joe Nelson of Southlake: Depending on the context of Jerry Jones’ new stadium comment (which I did not hear), and being a stickler for grammar, thanks to the awesome Sisters of St. Mary of Namur at Our Lady of Victory, “me and my family” would be accurate if preceded by a preposition “between” or “for” (necessitating objective case). What really irks me is when “between my family and I” or “for my family and I” are said. Always following a preposition (look them up), it is objective case.
As Sister Margaret Rose would say, “Woe betide you” in the error of your grammatical ways. The nuns at Our Lady of Victory still rock.
— Brenda Dolenz Helmer, Fort Worth
Disturbing image
I am old enough to know that “I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds” is what Robert Oppenheimer quoted from the Bhagavad Gita when he observed the first atomic bomb explode in New Mexico in 1945. It’s even more frightening when North Korea’s leader says it today, even in a cartoon. (See: Cam Cardow, The Ottawa Citizen editorial cartoon, May 31)
— Bruce Rider, Grapevine
What are the odds?
If any of my fellow Arlington residents have had their water meters actually read, I sure would like to know about it. The water department isn’t even pretending to read mine. My bill for last month was $100.88. This month’s bill is (guess what) $100.88.
C’mon, you don’t have to be a statistician to see the likelihood of that.
— Nancy Johnson, Arlington
Unfathomable vote
Author Richard Florida’s theory says a critical form of an urban area’s worth is human capital, made up of people who create “a good job market, economy, thick amenities (restaurants, arts, parks, etc.), appealing aesthetics, safe neighborhoods, viable public transportation or connectivity, etc.” That’s ironic at this time when the Texas Legislature has just usurped North Texas’ choice to construct the railways and roads that we desperately need to start now in order to prevent future gridlock on our roads, highways and freeways.
The human capital of North Texas — almost all our elected officials, members of Chambers of Commerce, residents committed to stopping gridlock and relieving pollution, etc. — fought hard for local-option taxing authority. I cannot fathom why legislators, most of whom do not represent North Texans, voted against our choice.
— Marguerite McKinney, Fort Worth
American Taliban
And now for a message from the American Taliban. After 16 years of effort, Dr. George Tiller has been successfully killed. Marked for extermination and demonized by groups like “Operation Rescue,” who called him a “monster” and “murderer,” the second shooting, at his church no less, finished him off. The first shooting in 1993 only winged him.
So, to the righteous patriots who condemn all Muslims for not uniting to confront the terrorists among them this question: May I assume that we can expect that you will now stand en mass to renounce the murderous and lunatic fringe of American Christianity that supports and encourages such outrageous acts of violence? I doubt it.
How little different one savage religious extremist is from another.
— JT Grant, Fort Worth
Either way, ironic
While a tragic and despicable act, it’s ironic that abortion Dr. George Tiller died at the hands of another who also had no qualms in violently ending life. Whether by gun or scalpel, how one justifies the other — well, maybe, cause and effect?
Either way, the incongruent logic used in justification is a slur of gigantic proportions on the sanctity of life, and forever escapes me.
— Richard M. Holbrook, Weatherford
Zim for District 3
One of Fort Worth’s District 3’s charms is the way that, despite its vastness, former City Council representative Chuck Silcox represented it. By defying notions of politicking, Silcox made it a community, making sure that the district came first. He also left big shoes to fill.
I believe, then, Zim Zimmerman is the best candidate for the City Council run-off election in District 3. His long history living, working and volunteering in Fort Worth justifies his endorsements by the Fort Worth Police Officers Association, Brenda Silcox and four of his opponents. While working at Lockheed Martin as the vice president of product support, he, for example, volunteered as the campaign chairman for the March of Dimes, the United Way and Texas A&M alumni groups.
Just because he has retired, that doesn’t mean he is unsure of his next job: the full-time City Council member for District 3.
— James Russell, Fort Worth
Sunday’s editorial on the District 3 council election, with the obvious untrue statement that “Zimmerman is a staid, say-no-to-everything sort,” demands a reply. Webster defines “staid” as “marked by settled sedateness and often prim restraint: sober, grave; syn. see ‘serious.’” Sedate is defined as keeping a steady attitude or pace: unruffled.” That sounds like an excellent recommendation for a city councilman.
Zim served many years as vice president for product support for Lockheed Martin. Do you really believe he earned and maintained that position by saying “no to everything?” I’ve known Zim for years and served with him on committees. He’s anything but a negative person. His attitude is consistently positive. Additionally, Zim is a fiscal conservative. In these troubled economic times, we need a councilman who will be concerned about how our tax dollars are being spent.
— Earl Miller, Fort Worth


Recent Comments